<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bingaman and Gates Back Chu on Clean Energy R&amp;D</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leadenergy.org/2010/01/bingaman-and-gates-back-chu-on-energy-rd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leadenergy.org/2010/01/bingaman-and-gates-back-chu-on-energy-rd/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 01:19:31 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: NYT calls for climate bill (but doesn&#8217;t address investment)</title>
		<link>http://leadenergy.org/2010/01/bingaman-and-gates-back-chu-on-energy-rd/comment-page-1/#comment-381</link>
		<dc:creator>NYT calls for climate bill (but doesn&#8217;t address investment)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 02:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leadenergy.org/?p=566#comment-381</guid>
		<description>[...] as previously noted in this blog, the Senate bill in its current form has far less federal investment in clean energy technology [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as previously noted in this blog, the Senate bill in its current form has far less federal investment in clean energy technology [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
