A new report released today, “Powering America’s Communities,” provides a comprehensive guide to state-level policies needed to unleash distributed clean energy technology in the United States.  The report was produced as part of the New Energy Leaders Project of Americans for Energy Leadership.

Powering America’s Communities” finds that distributed generation (DG) clean energy offers a unique set of benefits to electricity consumers, clean energy generators, and communities overall.  It provides a framework that can cost effectively spur the demand needed to push DG clean energy further down the cost curve, based in part on the best practices of numerous states. This framework is designed to overcome the four key barriers to widespread deployment of DG clean energy:

  • Insufficient demand for DG clean energy
  • Lack of proper incentives to stimulate investment in DG technologies
  • Exclusion of key rate payer groups from effectively using DG clean energy sources
  • Gaps in financing options for households and businesses looking to install DG systems

“Powering America’s Communities” not only showcases the best practices of state energy policy, but also introduce new ideas to promote DG clean energy without burdening ratepayers or taxpayers. Four central policy topics were explored that, if implemented, can put a state on the path toward greater clean energy adoption, local economic development, and greater energy security.

(more…)

Screen shot 2011-05-04 at 2.21.44 PMIn the high-stakes federal budget debate, getting the facts right is critical.  That is why the Heritage Foundation’s recent error-riddled report — which proposed a near-dismantling of the U.S. energy innovation system — demanded an immediate response, which Americans for Energy Leadership has provided with our colleagues at the Information Technology & Innovation Foundation (ITIF) and the Breakthrough Institute.

Last week, these three organizations released a point-by-point analysis of the inaccuracies and misrepresentations of Heritage’s proposal.  Today, we are releasing a new report on the fundamental misconceptions of Heritage’s approach.

Download: All About the Fundamentals: Three Misconceptions of the Heritage Foundation’s Deficit/Energy Proposal” [PDF]

The report highlights three major problems with the Heritage proposal:

1. The proposal fails to meaningfully reduce the deficit now or in the future.

Even though the proposal advocates cutting DOE research budgets in the name of deficit reduction, the Department of Energy represents a tiny portion of the federal budget and contributes little to the deficit and national debt. Moreover, the proposal fails to distinguish between government spending and productive public investment in science and technology, which drives innovation and economic growth.

2. Heritage fails to understand where technological innovations come from.

Heritage wrongly assumes that “when it comes to energy policy, the free market works” and is best suited to develop new technologies. In fact, the energy sector is anything but free, and has always been characterized by extensive regulations and subsidies, natural monopolies, and other divergences from the free-market ideal held by Heritage. Moreover, Heritage ignores the long history of public support for innovation and assumes the private sector will invest sufficiently in energy innovation. For decades, the energy sector has consistently underinvested in R&D, and market failures plague the energy innovation process at each stage of development, from lab to market launch. There is a broad expert consensus that public investment and public-private partnerships are essential to moving new, innovative technologies into the marketplace.

3. The proposal ignores the immediacy and enormity of U.S. energy challenges.

While Heritage pays lip service to energy security, its recommendations would undermine many of the best efforts underway to achieve it. The Department of Defense has recognized the critical role that innovative clean energy technologies will play in enhancing their strategic and tactical abilities, as well as the nation’s energy security. DOD also views the DOE as a strategic partner in its effort to reduce its own vulnerability from relying on fossil fuels. If Heritage had it their way, DOD would lose a key partner in the long-term effort for greater force effectiveness and security through better energy management.

Download the full report here.

Download the point-by-point rebuttal here.

Moving Beyond Cancun

With the climate talks in Cancun wrapping up, the blogosphere is sure to be flooded with posts about what we did and didn’t learn.  Beyond the lessons from this latest iteration of international climate negotiations, the end of Cancun provides an opportune moment to look at how we think about progress on climate change and energy in a more general sense. As usual, Andrew Revkin has cut to the heart of the issue, this time in a wrap up of his Cancun coverage in “Climate and Energy Beyond Cancún“:

“What’s important is to keep in mind the limits of what such efforts can accomplish. It was always wishful thinking to expect that 194 parties as varied as oil kingdoms, impoverished and dysfunctional African states, low island nations, superpowers and rising powers would someday magically adhere to a grand and legally binding instrument curtailing emissions of gases that, for a long time to come, will be a nearly direct proxy for economic activity.”

What we know for sure about climate related policy is that economics trump climate concerns.  You can apply this logic to America’s domestic policy landscape and you can apply it to world negotiations.  As such, real change wont come in spite of economics but because of it:

“That’s all fine, but this also means that the climate talks, which head to Durban, South Africa, next year, are not the place to watch for the breakthroughs — social, financial or technological — that will be required if the world is serious about providing some 9 billion people mid-century with the suite of services that come with abundant energy (mobility, communication, illumination, desalinated water and more) while also greatly cutting emissions from burning fossil fuels, which still dominate the global energy mix.”

Americans for Energy Leadership is committed to covering, discussing, and effecting the “social, financial [and] technological” factors that will drive a real energy transition.  Keep tuning in for expert coverage and analysis of all things clean energy, innovation, and technology related from the nation’s foremost young energy leaders.

Tagged with:
 

American Power in the Age of Innovation

A new article I co-authored, “Dynamic Balances: American Power in the Age of Innovation,” was just published in the latest volume of The SAIS Review of International Affairs The SAIS Review is the biannual journal of the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies, where my co-author Neil Shenai is a PhD Candidate.  (PDF download here)

The article arrives at a timely moment, as President Obama just today called for a new American “Sputnik moment” demanding more investment in education and science.  Last week, Secretary Chu similarly called for a new Sputnik moment with regards to clean energy technology.

Our article aims to challenge popular narratives on rising US-China power competition and offer a new theoretical framework for understanding the long-term advantage of leading states.  We argue that contrary to popular conceptions, the primary source of state power in the modern international system is the state’s ability to generate and harness technological innovation for economic development.  We position this interpretation within neorealist and neoclassical theories of great power dynamics and economic growth (respectively).
(more…)

Tagged with:
 

Special Series: The Future of Energy Technology

Thin Film Solar Panel

As we collectively stepped back this past week for Thanksgiving, the prospects for real change in the United States’ energy policy – at least in the near term – look rather bleak. If the policymaking machine is at a roadblock, can technology save the day?

The host of Democratic lawmakers and (a few liberal Republicans) who championed the fight against global warming pollution in the past two years will find it hard to promote the same approaches in the post-election environment. And while climate negotiators from around the world will make some headway on international climate talks as they gather in Cancun next week, most experts agree that any progress will be limited.

In this context, it is disturbingly unclear how the United States will manage to meet its climate pledge in the next ten years. And it remains equally uncertain how countries across the world will manage to keep global warming below 2 degrees Celsius. As it becomes increasingly clear that lawmaking and international negotiations won’t be enough to help us meet these goals, many have begun to look at technology as the answer.

In a forthcoming series of posts for Americans for Energy Leadership, I will explore the role that new technologies can play in helping us face the challenges – and opportunities – of our common energy future.

(more…)

Americans for Energy Leadership — one of the nation’s foremost energy policy think tanks and advocacy groups led by young people – is seeking applicants for the New Energy Leaders Project, an initiative to empower young thought leaders and help define the next national energy and economic agenda.

What: Selective program for young leaders to engage in high-level writing, research, and discussion at the intersection of energy, economic, and national security policy.

Why: The old energy and climate agenda has failed, and the United States needs a new generation of thought leaders to challenge conventional wisdom and shape the next agenda.

Who: Graduate students, undergrads, and young professionals

Positions: Policy Fellows, Featured Columnists, and Contributors

When: October 2010 – February 2011

Deadline for applications is October 1st, 2010

See full description below, download as a PDF, or view online here.

(more…)

Edison_Time_Magazine_CoverWelcome to our new Time Magazine readers.  Americans for Energy Leadership was just featured by Time’s must-read Special Annual History Cover Issue on Thomas Edison and U.S. technological leadership (July 5th), called “The Electrifying Edison.”  Time’s lead energy and environment reporter Bryan Walsh wrote:

“Inventors like Edison helped build America’s unparalleled scientific and technological dominance, a dominance that, more than any other single factor, made the 20th century the American century… the federal government played an important role through its own research laboratories and investments in education. Even when America’s scientific preeminence was threatened by the Soviet Union’s Sputnik launch in 1957, the U.S. only came back stronger. “The federal response to Sputnik was an overwhelming investment in science and engineering education,” says Teryn Norris, director of Americans for Energy Leadership. “That had spillover benefits across the board.” (emphasis added)

The article explains the critical importance of large-scale federal investment today in clean energy technology and education for the sake of America’s global leadership and competitiveness, adding Time’s voice to the ever-growing national “energy innovation consensus.”  It cites statistics from the previous report I co-authored with Breakthrough Institute and Information Technology & Innovation Foundation, “Rising Tigers, Sleeping Giant,” a widely acclaimed study containing the first comprehensive international review of clean energy competitiveness (see our updated “The Power to Compete” policy memo for more).  The article continues:

“It’s ironic that nowhere is America’s position in science and technology more threatened than in the industry that Edison essentially invented: energy. Clean power could be to the 21st century what aeronautics and the computer were to the 20th, but the U.S. is already falling behind. China, South Korea and Japan are set to invest more than $500 billion combined in clean technology over the next five years, while the U.S. is likely to invest less than $200 billion, and that’s assuming clean-energy legislation makes it into law. Meanwhile, Congress remains largely paralyzed.

The article, available in news stands this week, concludes by pointing to Bill Gates and Jeffrey Immelt, who recently joined forces with other business titans to launch the American Energy Innovation Council, calling for at least $16 billion per year in federal energy RD&D.

“In mid-June, a group of corporate titans, including Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates and GE CEO Jeffrey Immelt, descended on Washington to call for U.S. spending on energy research to be tripled.  They noted that the government today spends less than $5 billion a year on energy research and development – not counting temporary stimulus projects – compared with $30 billion annually on health research and more than $80 billion on military R&D. At a time when energy is more important than ever – and while oil from a blown well bleeds into the Gulf of Mexico – the U.S. no longer seems willing to create the environment that can engender the innovation we were once known for. “The world is not going to wait for the United States to lead,” said Immelt.  “This is about innovation.  This is about competition. This is about energy security.”

Some erosion of the U.S.’s scientific dominance is inevitable in a globalized world and might not even be a bad thing. Tomorrow’s innovators could arise in Shanghai or Seoul or Bangalore.  And Edison would counsel against panic – as he put it once, “Whatever setbacks America has encountered, it has always emerged as a stronger and more prosperous nation.”  But the U.S. will inevitably decline unless we invest in the education and research necessary to maintain the American edge.  The next generation of Edisons could be waiting.  But unless we move quickly, they won’t have the tools they need to thrive.”

AEL 2010 FellowsLast week, Americans for Energy Leadership welcomed its seven new 2010 Policy Fellows at our headquarters in Washington, DC to support our efforts and advance our mission of fostering the next generation of energy leaders.  All our fellows have significant experience and education in public policy, especially related to energy, and have either graduated or will soon graduate from universities including Stanford, Columbia, University of Pennsylvania, Washington University in St. Louis, University of California Berkeley, Georgetown, and Claremont McKenna.

The fellows began with an advanced, comprehensive reading course in energy policy, and to capstone their first week, they wrote an article on a topic of their choice. Excerpts of these articles are included below, and full articles can be accessed at the new AEL Fellows Blog.

The Time for a New American Narrative by Sydney Baloue

Last Tuesday night President Obama took to the Oval Office to reassure the nation of the government’s concerted efforts to solve the oil spill problem in the Gulf Coast. In between hitting the right measure of sympathy for Gulf victims and scorn for BP executives, the president managed to briefly mention his not-so-distant vision for America. We heard the calls for America to wean itself off of its obsession for fossil fuels and a short point on creating a stronger clean energy industry. Most outstanding however, was how the president noted that this time signifies a chance to, “seize the moment.” But what moment are we supposed to be seizing and how?

Energy Markets and the Government by Jeremy Cohn

The United States needs to invest in energy. Global and domestic energy demand is set to skyrocket in the coming years and the US is still heavily dependent on foreign imports, inefficient technologies, and fuels that are polluting our planet and threatening massive political and economic upheaval in the coming century. Throughout our history the US has turned to the unique power of technology and government investment when private industry was not enough: the Manhattan Project, Apollo Project, DARPA, the oil crises of the 1970s, and today’s energy crisis is no different.

(more…)

 

Over 100 Student Body Presidents Urge Congress to Support Energy Education

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
April 28, 2010

Contact: Teryn Norris
Phone: 510-593-3716
Email: norris -at- leadenergy.org

WASHINGTON, DC, APRIL 2010 — A group of more than 100 university and college student government presidents submitted a letter (PDF download) today urging Congress to launch a national program for clean energy science and engineering education. The presidents – representing more than one million American students –warned Congress that advanced energy education is critical for U.S. leadership in the global clean energy industry.

“The United States is rapidly falling behind in the burgeoning clean energy industry – especially in comparison to China – and our educational system and workforce is not prepared to compete,” declared the 107 presidents, including dozens of the country’s top universities. “American students are ready and willing to rise to this national challenge, and we need the federal government to support our education and training.”

The letter, organized by Americans for Energy Leadership and the Associated Students of Stanford University, calls on Congress to support the RE-ENERGYSE (“Regaining our Energy Science & Engineering Edge”) proposal, which would invest tens of millions of dollars annually in energy science and engineering education programs at universities, technical and community colleges, and K-12 schools. It was originally proposed by President Obama in April 2009 and is currently under consideration in Congress as part of the Department of Energy’s 2011 budget request.

(more…)

Tagged with:
 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: info@leadenergy.org
April 08, 2010 | Washington, DC

Calling Young Leaders: Apply for Policy Fellowship with Americans for Energy Leadership

Americans for Energy Leadership, a new project of Scientists & Engineers for America, is now accepting applications for the position of Policy Fellow, seeking the nation’s brightest young adults to perform high-level research, development, reporting, and advocacy on energy and innovation policy. Full-time and part-time positions are available in Washington, DC and across the country.

The position is paid and designed especially for college students, graduate students, recent graduates, and young professionals, including a full-time summer track and a non-resident, part-time track. Applications will be considered on a rolling basis until May 2nd for the summer track, and May 23rd for the non-resident track. See http://www.leadenergy.org/our-team/positions for more information (also posted below), and for upcoming information on open positions.

(more…)